Faith, by definition, is the belief in something despite insufficient knowledge to be certain of its veracity.
Yet in every case, there are two key components that make the prediction scientific:
The prediction, or the belief that the outcome can be accurately predicted, is predicated on the existence of quality evidence.
As the evidence changes — as we obtain more, newer and better evidence — and as the full suite of evidence expands, our predictions, postdictions and entire conceptions of the Universe change along with it.
There is no such thing as a good scientist who isn’t willing to both base their scientific belief on the full suite of evidence available, nor is there such a thing as a good scientist who won’t revise their beliefs in the face of new evidence.
I have a family member that teases me because I always ask about the evidence behind claims, assertions, etc. I guess years spent on a science PhD and postdoc will engrain a desire for evidence in you, but that desire has nothing to do with faith…
Religion and science… in harmony? The Pope and the Vatican have taken a stand with scientists against climate change. The encyclical released today will hopefully have huge impacts on the discussion surrounding climate change, but at the very least will make climate change a major topic of discussion in politics and religion. The church’s stand is already causing tension in US politics, with anti-science Republicans chastising the Pope for his stance. While the Pope and Catholic Church have a history of supporting the science of man-made climate change, this makes climate change a part of the church’s official teaching. Very exciting times! And who thought religion, especially the Catholic Church, would be fighting alongside scientists??
Lots of commentary about this news all over the internet, here are a bunch from The Conversation!!
I find a very good measure of correlation between my religious beliefs and my scientific beliefs. People say, ‘How can you be a scientist? How can you be a surgeon if you dont believe in certain things?’ Maybe those things aren’t scientific, maybe its just propaganda.
Sounds like Carson is picking and choosing the science he wants to mesh with his religion and calling the rest propaganda… yikes! For not wanting to make a science and religion statement into a soundbite, he certainly provided one.
In case you missed it, we have a new Defender of Science (and evolution) in an unexpected place!
Background here: Curt Shilling and Keith Law, both ESPN baseball analysts, engaged in a twitter debate about evolution and science. Curt Shilling posted a number of tweets questioning evolution, which Keith Law rebutted with SCIENCE! ESPN then suspended Law for defending evolution, but then later reinstated him. Obviously all of this caused a huge commotion in the twitter-verse. More on the story here and here. Keith Law not only wins for defending science, but also for his tweet response after being reinstated by ESPN…. shout out to science heretic history~!
After a crusading religious group showed up at the Gilbert, Arizona school board meeting with three Republican state senators to complain about the presence of a mention of abortion in an honors biology text book, the board voted to get rid of that material. It was determined that the most efficient way to remove the offending material is to literally remove it – as in, tear the whole page out of the book.
In my opinion, once you are ripping out pages of textbooks that you don’t like, it’s only a short step to burning books that you don’t like. Not to mention that censorship of academia and science has worked out real well for other groups throughout history (cough cough, sarcasm).
Glad to hear that the Gilbert School Board that mandated this blasphemous act (against science… and freedom … duh) is on its way out after losing in the elections earlier this week. For more on that, watch this video segment from the Rachel Maddow Show!
When we read about Creation in Genesis, we run the risk of imagining God was a magician, with a magic wand able to do everything — but that is not so. He created human beings and let them develop according to the internal laws that he gave to each one so they would reach their fulfillment.
God is not a divine being or a magician, but the Creator who brought everything to life. Evolution in nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of beings that evolve.
Therefore the scientist, and above all the Christian scientist, must adopt the approach of posing questions regarding the future of humanity and of the earth, and, of being free and responsible, helping to prepare it and preserve it, to eliminate risks to the environment of both a natural and human nature. But, at the same time, the scientist must be motivated by the confidence that nature hides, in her evolutionary mechanisms, potentialities for intelligence and freedom to discover and realize, to achieve the development that is in the plan of the creator.
Watch the live steam of the multimedia event: 24 Hours of Reality by the Climate Reality Project. Each hour covers a new topic on climate change and climate hope. The coming hours are sure to include more inspirational stories and facts from around the globe. Specifically, the topics will include clean and renewable energies in different countries and the impact this clean energy has on security, job growth, economics, public health, and more! If that weren’t enough, the coming hours will also feature musical guests Jack Johnson, Colbie Caillat, Fitz and the Tantrums, Boyz II Men, and Jason Mraz!