What does it mean when scientists say peer-reviewed?? #academiclife

Want a good explanation of what peer review is? How it works? What the process is like? The Conversation has posted a terrific description of peer review basics. The authors (Andre Spicer and Thomas Roulet) also give a nice summary of the benefits of peer-review, but also the problems with the current peer-review system. Check it out!

Peer review is one of the gold standards of science. It’s a process where scientists (“peers”) evaluate the quality of other scientists’ work. By doing this, they aim to ensure the work is rigorous, coherent, uses past research and adds to what we already knew.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “What does it mean when scientists say peer-reviewed?? #academiclife

  1. Pingback: Problems in Science Part 1: the broken economics of academic publishing | CauseScience

  2. Pingback: Times are a changin’: Testing out double-blind peer review in scientific publishing #abouttime | CauseScience

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s